Politics

Federal Prosecutor Investigating ICE Officer for Civil Rights Crimes Fired

CBS News Original sources ↓

Here's a wild one out of Minnesota: the federal prosecutor who was building a civil rights case against an ICE officer just got fired — and it happened the same week that officer was finally charged with a crime, though not the crime a lot of people expected.

Quick backstory: back in January, ICE officer Christian Castro shot a Venezuelan immigrant named Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis in the leg during an immigration crackdown in Minneapolis. The government's story about what happened kept shifting — accounts of the interaction that led to the shooting shifted in the immediate aftermath, with the Department of Homeland Security initially saying Sosa-Celis fled a traffic stop, crashed, and fled on foot. But video evidence later contradicted that, and things got messy — federal prosecutors actually dropped charges against Sosa-Celis and another man in February, citing new evidence, and dismissed them with prejudice, meaning they couldn't be brought back. Castro himself ended up suspended.

Now to the actual news: a federal prosecutor in Minnesota who was investigating that ICE officer for possible civil rights crimes has been fired, according to four sources familiar with the matter. That prosecutor, Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Evans, was investigating ICE officer Christian Castro over the shooting. This week, the Justice Department charged Castro with making false statements about the incident, though the indictment remains sealed. Notice what's missing there — a false-statements charge is a lot lighter than a civil rights violation.

And that's exactly the controversy. ProPublica reported that Evans told the shooting victims' attorneys to prepare for Castro to only be charged with making false statements, which carries lesser penalties than a charge that he violated people's constitutional rights. Basically, Evans appears to have said the DOJ was blocking him from pursuing the tougher charge. Days after that story broke, he lost his job. The DOJ's stated reason isn't about the case's merits, though — three sources say Evans is under investigation by the Justice Department, with two saying it focuses on allegations of leaking. Other outlets reported similarly: the prosecutor has been fired and is under investigation for alleged obstruction of a grand jury probe.

Why should you care if you don't live in Minneapolis? This is really a story about whether federal prosecutors can push back on their own bosses when they think a case against a government officer is being softened — and what happens to them if they do. It's landing on top of a bigger pattern: a whole section of the DOJ's Civil Rights Division saw resignations over how it handled a related ICE shooting death in the same city just weeks earlier. Whether Evans was fired for leaking, as the DOJ claims, or for pushing too hard on a politically sensitive case, is now the real question — and it's one prosecutors, watchdogs, and the public will be watching closely.

Claude’s Scrutiny

78/100

The DOJ's official reason for firing Evans — leaking and grand jury obstruction — comes from anonymous sources, not documents or an on-record statement, so we're taking the government's framing on faith while the fired prosecutor's side (that he was blocked from a stronger charge) is the one that's actually documented via ProPublica's letter.

Key Takeaways

  • A federal prosecutor investigating ICE officer Christian Castro for a possible civil rights crime got fired right as Castro was charged — but only with a lesser 'false statements' offense.
  • The DOJ says the prosecutor, Matthew Evans, is under investigation for leaking info and obstructing a grand jury probe — not for anything about the case itself.
  • ProPublica reported Evans told the victim's lawyers that DOJ officials blocked him from pursuing the tougher civil rights charge, which he believed the evidence supported.
  • This isn't an isolated incident — it follows a wave of resignations in the DOJ's Civil Rights Division over how a separate, fatal ICE shooting in the same city was handled.
  • The government's account of the original January shooting has shifted multiple times, and video evidence has repeatedly undercut the officer's version of events.

Perspectives

How each outlet covered the story — and where it stands relative to the others.

  • The original source; focuses tightly on the firing itself and the DOJ's leaking allegation against the prosecutor.

  • Ties the firing directly to the indictment news and gives more detail on Castro's earlier extradition fight in Texas.

  • Includes a DOJ-aligned source directly disputing Evans' characterization, giving the department's pushback more airtime than other outlets.

  • Leans most heavily on ProPublica's letter, quoting Evans' 'strongest possible' objections to the lighter charge.

  • Lays out the shifting official narrative of the original shooting and how video evidence undercut the government's account.

  • Provides broader context on the mass resignations inside DOJ's Civil Rights Division tied to the related fatal ICE shooting of Renee Good.

  • Frames the light charge against Castro as unusually rare for the Trump administration and notes ICE agents in other fatal shootings still haven't been charged.

My Notes

Generated 09/04/2026 05:54 UTC

Sloth is free. If it’s useful, you can help keep it running.

Support Sloth on Ko-fi ↗